Students: Now and Then
Are students really all that different “Now” than they were “Before”? It is a very common proclamation that young people now have no respect, no motivation, and no problem solving ability. But really, I heard this for a while now, including when I was in school. And I still hear it now. Is each generation getting worse and worse, or do we just have that perception, that our generation was better somehow, and the generation before us, even more?
A few weeks ago, I had a discussion on this topic with one of my friends: we went to High School together, but now she’s a T.A. at McGill University in the Engineering Department, so she gets to see and teach many engineering students. To my surprise, she was convinced that students “now-a-days” are terribly prepared, and lack any ability to problem solve. She said that “compared to when we were in high school” the students are very different, incompetent. This is a common perception with people today, non teachers and teachers alike. I cannot support this view.
Of course, each generation is different; technology forces us to think differently, use different tools. For example, when my Mom went to university, and had to write a paper, using a typewriter, she needed to be precise, not make mistakes, typos or spelling. A few errors and she would have to start again. Thus she learned to concentrate, to go slow but sure not to make mistakes. Her organization had to be linear, everything in order, one after the other, because there was no way of returning to a previous thought. When I went to university, I used a computer to write my papers. I could change my format 100 times, and it wouldn’t make any difference. I could make spelling mistakes, because spell-check would catch them. I did not learn to be careful; I learned instead to think fast, chaotic, because that’s what my tools let me do. We have such a different way at looking at things now, but if we were to get the same math problem (she’s also a math teacher), neither of us would give up, or have trouble solving it. We would probably attempt the problem very differently, that’s all.
The same goes for students of NOW. They have so much technology behind them that not everything we teach necessarily registers as useful to them. We see the world in one way, because we were brought up with tools that made us think that way, but for the kids of today, this might not be the right way – they have new tools, new ways of handling information.
When discussing kids toys, one lady I talked to said that we are bringing up a generation of “button-pushers” and of “instant gratification”. Well of course we are… this is what technology calls for. But is this so wrong? Why do we think this is the wrong way to go?
I look at my students and think how wrong my Engineering friend is. My students are smart, they want to accomplish something, they have dreams (like I did when I was their age), they are problem solvers, and they don’t give up. I think our next generation is a motivated, smart, and a problem solving generation. I have no doubts that our world will grow and prosper, that one of our students will find the cure for cancer, that one of our students will construct the solar powered car. The only thing I hope is that I can make a difference in one of these student’s lives… this is why I’m a teacher.
Hope you liked the post. Please do me a favour ...
| Leave a Comment | Subscribe to Feed | |
|
| ||



Comments
As a middle school educator,
on Thu, 02/19/2009 - 20:34
As a middle school educator, I agree with your friend the engineer. Students come to me with less ability and skill than what students I had ten years ago possessed. All the way down the line, students are being let off of responsibility. Education is an entitlement, not something you have to work at. Computers won't catch everything - your essay is a prime example of that. There are comma splices, run-ons, misplaced modifiers . . . I prefer students who can think for themselves and use technology as a tool rather than rely on it for their day-to-day lives.
Agree 50%
on Fri, 02/20/2009 - 19:51
I agree somewhat with the Middle School Educator. It is somehow coolest, or most powerful, to know everything from first principles. Nowadays however, we obviously can't be that way. I don't know how to build a train yet I rely on one daily to get to work. I couldn't even make a single bolt of that train with just my bare hands and brain. Surely it would be awesome to know how to do such a thing and it would come in very handy if the train malfunctioned and I could just jump into the locomotive to fix it. It just isn't going to happen in real life.
I think that the point being made by Bogusia is that the same kind of opinion could be put forward towards students. Perhaps not everyone needs to learn how to write well, or the multiplication tables, or even how to add past ten in their heads. We have cheap tools for that!
Few young people know how to write a letter because they don't write letters, but they know the IM and text-message acronyms in which I am illiterate. If they need to do their taxes they use a tax program, which does all the math. They can build a retirement plan by talking to a banker and not know a thing about compound interest. They can get to Vancouver's Winter Olympics without knowing how to find Canada on the map.
How much is really needed for survival in the world or excellence in a particular field?
I wrote this post two years
on Fri, 02/20/2009 - 22:07
I wrote this post two years ago, almost to the day. So I had to reread it to make sure if I still agree with myself. And the verdict is: YUP, I'm still right... hahaha.
I teach high school physics right now, and I honestly can say that my students are really up to par with the students I taught 7, 8 years ago (when I just started teaching). The way we treat them is what we get. If we treat them like babies, we'll have to give them everything on a silver platter. But if I treat them as mature independent learners, they give me the right results, the right attitude.
My attitude towards them makes all the difference!
Now about my writing: I was never a good writer - more of a math/science nerd. However, in this post, I think my message is conveyed, and the reader got the jist of what I wanted to pass on. I don't write for a newspaper, and probably would never get a job at doing so. But I am a math and science teacher, and hopefully an excellent one. I am sorry about my "misplaced modifiers". I write because it makes me think about my teaching, it makes me reflect about how to improve myself (as a teacher, not writer).
I agree - computers will not pick up everything; they are to be used as tools, and that's it. But what powerful tools they can be.... I could not be writing this, sharing my thoughts like this without the power of technology. Shouldn't we let our students use these tools to the extent they can? It's a different world out there! Let's adjust.
I heard this analogy somewhere:
"If you sold water in the middle of the desert, you would make a killing. But now, imagine the climate completely changed, and it started pouring rain on the desert. You would have to change your money making enterprise instantly to adjust."
I think some of us are still in denial about technology. We don't understand, or choose not to understand, that technology is upon us, that we need to adjust the way we teach. We need to adjust what we teach, what's the purpose of our teaching, etc.
Technology is here to stay, like the rain, and we can't sell water anymore. We just HAVE TO change! Our students did, and now we have an illusion that they are not as smart as we were, not as good of problem solvers as the kids ten years ago, etc. I think we are the ones staying still, and the kids moving ahead. I think it's us teachers that have to move forward, and try not hold our students back!